@article{oai:rekihaku.repo.nii.ac.jp:00001104,
 author = {一ノ瀬, 俊也 and Ichinose, Toshiya},
 journal = {国立歴史民俗博物館研究報告, Bulletin of the National Museum of Japanese History},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {application/pdf, 各市町村における従軍者記念誌は、日露戦争終結直後、戦死者が忘却されていくことを嘆いて作られた。だが第一次大戦後、主に在郷軍人会市町村分会によって作られた記念誌は、そのような後ろ向きの意図ではなく、ある積極的な政治的意図、すなわち過去の栄光の記録・記憶化を通じて軍人という自己の存在意義を再確認し、反軍平和思想の盛んだった社会に訴えていくために作られていった。そのような記念誌の中で日清・日露の追憶を語った老兵たちは、戦死者の壮絶な死を語って戦争の「記憶」に具体性を与えて、人々の共感を呼び起こす役回りを演じた。そうした語りのあり方は「郷土の英雄」を求める人々の心情にもかなうものだった。老兵たちが自己の従軍体験を語る際、確かに悲惨な体験も語ったものの、基本的には名誉心充足の機会として戦争を描いていた。そのような従軍者たちの「語り」を彼らの〝郷土〟が一書に編む時、彼らが国家の大きな歴史に占めた位置、役割の説明が熱心に行われた。それは戦死者の死の〝意味〟を明らかにし、ひいては戦争自体の持つ価値を地域ぐるみで再確認、受容することに他ならなかった。
以上の過程を通じて、満州事変勃発以前から満州は「血をもって購った」土地であり、したがってその権益は擁護されるべきという論理や「社会主義共産主義」の脅威が市町村という末端レベルで繰り返し確認されていった。満州事変に際して軍、在郷軍人会などが国民の支持を調達する際、日露戦争の「記憶」を強調したことは周知のことだが、本稿が掲げた諸事例は、そのような「記憶」が当時の社会において具体的にいつから、どのようにして共有化されていったのかを示すものである。, This paper examines the contents of “Memorial Journals of Men in Service” which were published in the various cities and villages before WW II, These memorial journals were created in large numbers mainly by the community posts of the Civilian Militia (Zaigo Gunjin Kai) after WW I with the highly political intention of reconfirming military servicemen's sense of raison d'etre through recording and committing to memory past glories and making an appeal to society in this age of anti-militaristic peace-seekers.
The old soldiers who disclosed their memoirs of the Sino-Japanese and the Russo-Japanese Wars in these memorial journals took on the role of storytellers, telling stories of the heroic deaths of fallen soldiers and giving concrete detail to “memories” of war so as to draw sympathy from readers. This type of storytelling suited well the sentiment of the people who sought to find “heroes from their own hometown”. When these old soldiers reminisced about their time in service, it is true they spoke also of horrible experiences, however they basically portrayed war as an opportunity to satisfy one's sense of honor. When these “stories” by the former servicemen were edited in their “hometowns”, the editors avidly sought to make clear the positions and roles that these storytellers had occupied in the large sweep of history. This was done in order to make clear the “significance” of the deaths of those who died but, at the same time, it also was a way for the entire society to reconfirm and accept the values that war proposed to the state and to individuals.
Through the above process, the logic that Manchuria was, even before the Manchurian Incident broke out, land “paid for with blood” and that interests in the region should therefore be protected, as well as the threat of socialism and communism, were repeatedly confirmed at the endmost level of society, in the communities. It is well known that in order to gather the people's support, at the outburst of the Manchurian Incident, the military and the Civilian Militia emphasized the people's “memories” of the Russo-Japanese War. The various examples given in this paper offer insights on details as to when such “memories” began to be shared by the communities of the time.},
 pages = {593--610},
 title = {紙の忠魂碑 : 市町村刊行の従軍者記念誌（2. 慰霊）},
 volume = {102},
 year = {2003},
 yomi = {イチノセ, トシヤ}
}