@article{oai:rekihaku.repo.nii.ac.jp:00001255,
 author = {山川, 均 and Yamakawa, Hitoshi},
 journal = {国立歴史民俗博物館研究報告, Bulletin of the National Museum of Japanese History},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {application/pdf, 中世都市奈良を研究する上で最も基礎的、かつ重要な史料である『大乗院寺社雑事記』の分析から、中世都市奈良に住し、かつ物品の流通や生産の中核に位置した大乗院院主・尋尊の「土器」に関する認識を多角的に検討する。また、実際の発掘資料などをもとにした土器生産とその管理体制についても併せて検討を加える。以上の結果、中世の土器生産を管轄した「座」とは単に土器の生産に関わった組織ではなく、土器以外の多種の食器類などの調進にも関わったことが判明した。また、座の管理機構は中世都市奈良の内部に存在したが、土器の生産自体は都市の西部に位置する西京において行われていたことが明らかになった。
すなわち中世土器の生産と流通に関する研究においては、生産地と消費地というシンプルな関係のみならず（それが都市を媒介とするものである限りにおいては）、その管理機構をも含み込んだ複眼的な視座を設ける必要がある。近年の学際的都市研究（考古学が参加するもの）の動向としては、もっぱら地理学的な意味における「領域」の検討が重視されているが、それは主に遺構論において有効な手段といえよう。遺物などの物的資料から考究すべき「都市」とは、堀その他の囲繞施設から判断される狭義の都市領域概念に止まらず、周辺領域を包括した広義の概念下において多元的に検討を加えられるべき性格を有するものと判断する。, This paper examines from a number of perspectives the perception of “earthenware” held by Jinson, the head of Daijoin temple, who lived in Nara and played a key role in the distribution and production of commodities. The study is based on an analysis of the Daijoin-jishazojiki (Records of the Daijoin Temple), which serve as most fundamental and important historical materials for research into the medieval city of Nara. In addition to these records, materials derived from actual excavations have also been used for this study of earthenware production and the system adopted for their control. The findings of this research reveal that the guild (za) which controlled the production of earthenware during the Middle Ages was not simply an organization involved in the production of earthenware, but that it also participated in the supply of many other kinds of dishes. Furthermore, though the mechanism for controlling the guild existed inside the medieval city of Nara, the study also showed that the production of the earthenware itself took place in Nishinokyo, an area located in the western part of the city.
In other words, when undertaking research into the production and distribution of earthenware during the Middle Ages, in addition to looking at the simple relationship between areas of production and areas of consumption (only in cases in which a city plays a role), it is also necessary to adopt a wider perspective that also encompasses mechanisms for their control. One trend in interdisciplinary research involving archeology in recent years has been the importance attached to the study of “territory” exclusively in its geographical sense, which is certainly an effective method for the discussion of former mechanisms and systems. However, for “cities” that should be investigated through physical materials such as relics, the concept of a city's territory should not be restricted in its narrow sense so that it stops at a city's moat and surrounding facilities. Rather, such investigations should be characterized by the addition of a multi-dimensional approach that includes a broader concept of “territory” that takes in neighboring areas.},
 pages = {243--260},
 title = {中世都市奈良と土器 : 『大乗院寺社雑事記』にみるその認識と評価（5. 家政と生産）},
 volume = {113},
 year = {2004},
 yomi = {ヤマカワ, ヒトシ}
}