@article{oai:rekihaku.repo.nii.ac.jp:00001336, author = {宇野, 功一 and Uno, Kouiti}, journal = {国立歴史民俗博物館研究報告, Bulletin of the National Museum of Japanese History}, month = {Mar}, note = {application/pdf, 近世博多の祭礼祇園山笠を例に、祭礼費用の増加過程と、その結果として生じた祭礼費用徴収法の変更および祭礼費用負担者層の拡大の諸相について明らかにした。分析対象は行町と片土居町という二つの町である。 祇園山笠には二つの当番、山笠当番と能当番があった。本稿ではおもに、より重要でより多額の費用を要する山笠当番について論じた。この当番は数年に一度または十数年に一度だけ各町に巡って来たので、各町はこの間に多額の当番費用を準備することができた。そのためこの祭礼は徐々に豪華になっていった。しかし江戸後期になると当番費用が高騰し、豊かでない町では当番費用の徴収法に工夫を凝らすことになった。 分析した二町の例から、当番費用負担者層と当番運営者層が町内の表店に居住する全世帯に拡大していく過程が観察された。とりわけ幕末の片土居町ではこの拡大が極限にまで達していた。つまりこの町では居付地主・地借・店借の別なく町内の表店全世帯に同額の当番費用が割り振られており、当番運営においても原則的には表店の全世帯主が平等に参加していたようである。また、その内容は異なるものの、両町とも町中抱の家屋敷を利用することで当番費用の一部を捻出していた。 特異な祭礼運営仕法によって祭礼費用が高くなりすぎた結果、祭礼費用にかんして徴収法の変更と負担者層の拡大がなされ、それに伴い祭礼運営者層も拡大した、という一例を示した。, Using the Gion-Yamakasa festival held in Hakata during the Edo period as an example, this paper brings to light the increase in the cost of festival and the subsequent changes to the method of collecting festival funds and the broadening of the group that provided these funds. The study centers on two chous (administrative districts), Gyou-no-chou and Katadoi-machi. There were two parts to taking turns for the Gion-Yamakasa―one that involved the Yamakasa and the other Noh. This paper looks at turns for the Yamakasa, the more important and more costly of the two. Turns were circulated among the chous so that each chou took a turn only once every several to ten years or so, which enabled them to put together the huge amount needed during the interim period. This is responsible for the gradually increasing elegance of the festival. However, the cost of staging the Yamakasa skyrocketed at the late of the Edo period, making it very difficult for chous that were not very well off to gather the funds required using their traditional methods of collection. It was in response to this situation that the method employed for collecting funds was changed and the group of people called on to provide such funds was broadened. A study of the two chous shows that the group of people providing the funds and the group of people who ran the festival when it was their turn was expanded to include all households in the chou. This expansion reached particularly extreme proportions in Katadoi-machi at the end of the Edo period. The same levy was placed on each household in the chou, and with regard to running the festival as well, it appears that in principle each household head played an equal role. Though of a different nature, both chous managed to raise some of the funds required by using houses and land owned by their Choujuu (body that administered the chou).}, pages = {45--104}, title = {近世博多祇園山笠における当番町制度と当番費用徴収法}, volume = {121}, year = {2005}, yomi = {ウノ, コウイチ} }