@article{oai:rekihaku.repo.nii.ac.jp:00001630,
 author = {馬場, 伸一郎 and BaBa, Shinichiro},
 journal = {国立歴史民俗博物館研究報告, Bulletin of the National Museum of Japanese History},
 month = {Nov},
 note = {application/pdf, 本稿の目的は，中部高地に分布する弥生中期・栗林式土器編年の再構築と広域編年上の位置づけ，分布と動態の明確化を行うことで，人の「うごき」を具体化することである。弥生社会・文化の研究という総合的研究を射程とするならば，まず土器型式の設定や細分，広域編年の作成は必須である。
分析の結果，弥生IV期前半である栗林2式新段階は栗林式の分布域が最大化する時期であり，またその時期には，栗林式の中心地から離れた上越高田平野の吹上遺跡と北武蔵妻沼低地の北島遺跡で，栗林式およびその系統の土器が多量に出土するという現象を確認した。さらに同時期，小松式関連の土器分布のあり方から，高田平野から北関東へ抜ける主要交流ルートが「白根山－吾妻川ルート」から「千曲川－碓氷川ルート」へ転換することが判明した。そして千曲川流域内で最大級の集落遺跡である松原遺跡に，小松式関連土器の出土が偏る。
まさにそうした土器分布の動態のあり方は人々の往来の仕方の変化であり，特定の場所で生産される物資の互酬性的交換活動のあり方の変化を示すと考えられる。栗林2式新段階は折しも佐渡産管玉の流通が明瞭になり，また長野盆地南部の榎田遺跡と松原遺跡の間で磨製石斧生産の分業が確立する時期である。異系統土器を多量に出土する複数の遺跡は，異系統土器集団間の「交易場」であると考えられる。
すなわち，IV期前半の栗林式集団による広域ネットワークの形成と「交易場」の設定，長野盆地南部の磨製石斧分業生産の確立は，パラレルに進展した歴史的事象であり，集団間の互酬性的交易活動の極度の発達を示す歴史的意義をもつと考えられる。, The aim of this article is to obtain clues for fleshing out the “movements” of people through reconsideration of the chronology of Kuribayashi-style pottery from the mid-Yayoi Period found in the Chubu highlands; identifying that pottery in a broad chronological context; and clarifying the dynamics of that distribution. An overall study of Yayoi society/culture requires establishing and classifying pottery styles and creating a broad chronology.
As a result of such analysis, I was able to confirm that the latter stage of Kuribayashi style 2, located in the earlier half of the Yayoi IV Period, was a period during which the distribution of Kuribayashi-style potteries was maximized, and also that Kuribayashi-style potteries and their variations were excavated in large numbers from the Fukiage site of Joetsu Takada Plain and the Kitajima site of the Kitamusashi Tsumanuma lowlands, both far from the watershed of the Chikuma River, the center of the Kuribayashi style. Also, during this period, the major communication route passing from Takada Plain to Northern Kanto changed from the “Mt. Shirane-Azuma River route” to the “Chikuma River-Usui River route”, as can be deduced from the distribution of Komatsu-style potteries and their variations. Komatsu-style potteries and their variations are excavated mainly from Matsubara site, the largest colonial site in the watershed area of Chikuma River.
The dynamics of such pottery distribution is considered to indicate change in the way people intercommunicated, especially the way they reciprocally exchanged supplies produced in particular places. It so happens that the latter stage of Kuribayashi style 2 has been identified as a period of production of kudatama beads in Sado, and a division of labor for the production of polished stone axes became established between the Enokida site and Matsubara site in the southern Nagano Basin. Several sites from which various pottery types were excavated are considered to have been “trading points” for groups with different pottery types.
That is to say, formation of a wide-area network by Kuribayashi-style groups during the earlier half of the IV Period, the establishment of “trading points”, and of a division of labor for the production of polished stone axes in the southern Nagano Basin are historical phenomena that developed in parallel, and they are considered to possess historical significance in their indicating the extent of the development of reciprocal exchange activities between groups.},
 pages = {101--174},
 title = {弥生中期・栗林式土器編年の再構築と分布論的研究 : 弥生交易論の可能性を視野に入れて},
 volume = {145},
 year = {2008},
 yomi = {ババ, シンイチロウ}
}