@article{oai:rekihaku.repo.nii.ac.jp:00001736,
 author = {藤沢, 敦 and Fujisawa, Atsushi},
 journal = {国立歴史民俗博物館研究報告, Bulletin of the National Museum of Japanese History},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {application/pdf, 日本列島で古代国家が形成されていく過程において，本州島北部から北海道には，独自の歴史が展開する。古墳時代併行期においては，南東北の古墳に対して，北東北・北海道では続縄文系の墓が造られる。７世紀以降は，南東北の終末期の古墳と，北東北の「末期古墳」，そして北海道の続縄文系の墓という，３つに大別される墳墓が展開する。
南東北の古墳と，北東北の続縄文系の墓と７世紀以降の「末期古墳」の関係については，資料が豊富な太平洋側で検討した。墳墓を中心とする考古資料に見える文化の違いは，常に漸進的な変移を示しており，明確な境界は存在しない。異なる文化の境界は，明確な境界線ではなく，広い境界領域として現れる。このような中で，大和政権から律令国家へ至る中央政権は，宮城県中部の仙台平野以北の人々を蝦夷として異族視する。各種考古資料の分布から見ると，最も違いが不明確なところに，倭人と蝦夷の境界が置かれている。
東北北部と北海道では，７世紀以降，北東北の「末期古墳」と北海道の続縄文系の墓という違いが顕在化する。この両者の関係を考える上で重要なことは，「末期古墳」が，北海道の道央部にも分布する点である。道央部では，北東北の「末期古墳」と強い共通点を持ちつつ，部分的に変容した墓も造られる。しかも，続縄文系の墓と「末期古墳」に類似する墓が，同じ遺跡で造られる事例が存在する。さらに，続縄文系の墓の中には，「末期古墳」の影響を伺わせるものもある。道央部では，「末期古墳」と続縄文系の墓は密接な関係を有し，両者を明確な境界で区分することは困難である。
このような墳墓を中心に見た検討から見ると，異なる文化間の境界は，截然としたラインで区分できない。このことは，文化の違いが，人間集団の違いに，簡単に対応するものではないことを示している。, During the period when the ancient state was being formed in Japan, a separate history was unfolding in the region from northern Honshu to Hokkaido. Whereas kofun (mounded tombs) were built in southern Tohoku, in northern Tohoku and Hokkaido, Zoku-Jomon (continuing Jomon) type graves were built. There were three broad types of graves in the period starting in the 7th century: end stage kofun in southern Tohoku,“final stage kofun”in northern Tohoku, and Zoku-Jomon type graves in Hokkaido.
The author studied southern Tohoku kofun and Zoku-Jomon type graves in northern Tohoku on the Pacific Ocean side, for which there is an abundance of materials, and their relationship with “final stage kofun”in the period starting from the 7th century. With regard to cultural differences as seen from archaeological materials centering on graves, changes were consistently incremental and there were no clear boundaries. The boundary between one culture and another covered a large area with no definitive line of demarcation. From the time of the Yamato government to the establishment of the ritsuryo state, central government regarded people from north of the Sendai Plain in the center of Miyagi Prefecture as Emishi, who were ethnically different. The distribution of various archaeological materials reveals that the least clear differences are to be found within the boundaries between the Yamato and Emishi peoples.
In northern Honshu and Hokkaido, there is a marked difference between the“final stage kofun” of northern Tohoku and the Zoku-Jomon type graves of Hokkaido in the period starting from the7 th century. An important point to consider when studying the relationship between the two is that “final stage kofun”are also to be found in central Hokkaido. In central Hokkaido graves were built that had been partially modified while maintaining strong similarities with the“final stage kofun”of northern Tohoku. What is more, there are cases where graves resembling both Zoku-Jomon type graves and“final stage kofun”were built at the same site. There are also some Zoku-Jomon type graves that display hints of the influence of“final stage kofun”. In central Hokkaido there is a strong relationship between“final stage kofun”and Zoku-Jomon type graves, which makes it difficult to establish a clear boundary line between the two.
This study centering on these graves shows that it is not possible to draw a clear boundary line delineating these different cultures. It shows that cultural differences don't readily correspond to differences in human groups.},
 pages = {441--458},
 title = {墳墓から見た古代の本州島北部と北海道（第3部 古代接触領域の研究）},
 volume = {152},
 year = {2009},
 yomi = {フジサワ, アツシ}
}