@article{oai:rekihaku.repo.nii.ac.jp:00001879,
 author = {大門, 哲 and Daimon, Satoru},
 journal = {国立歴史民俗博物館研究報告, Bulletin of the National Museum of Japanese History},
 month = {Jan},
 note = {application/pdf, 民俗学における稲作特化保障論の近年の関心は，内部資源の多面的利用，いいかえれば家の個別生計状況に集中しているが，いうまでもなく，家をとりまく政治力学を看過することはできない。今回とくに注目したいのは，民俗学で旧来等閑視されてきた耕地整理事業の意義である。
明治以降の耕地整理事業といえば，国家事業として全国画一的に展開され，事業後，劇的に農法が変質したような印象がある。しかし，河北潟東北域に位置する津幡町川尻を対象に，当該事業の導入経緯をみると，そのような印象は根拠がないことがわかる。
まず，空間編成においては，潟縁に位置する地理的環境や，近世期より水運業が稼ぎとして行なわれた関係から，クリークを基軸とする水郷空間への再編が重視された。これによって，農耕用の舟が激増し，河口は舟小屋が並ぶ係留場へと変貌した。つまり，当時の事業は，地域の歴史や環境に適した「現地化」がはかられたわけである。
つぎに，作業内容の変化をみると，水郷空間の造成により，舟運輸送が普及し，収穫後の稲の搬送コストが大幅に軽減されたものの，本田準備作業は，畜耕や蓮華草栽培などの乾田農法を導入するに至らず，藩政期の農法を存続せざるを得なかった。
劇的な作業変化がおきなかったのは，乾田化がされなかったという土壌環境のほか，地主が圧倒的な権威をもち，技術革新に必要な小作層の組織化が停滞したことや，また地主が肥料問屋を営む関係から肥料市場の変化を望まなかったことなど，社会・経済的な要因が複雑に影響を及ぼしたからである。このことは，稲作が地域の政治･経済的な適切性をめぐって結実する社会的実践であったことを物語る。, The recent interest in the argument surrounding the security of rice cultivation specialization in folkloric studies concentrates on multilateral utilization of internal resources, or the individual living situations of households. Needless to say, however, political dynamics surrounding households must not be overlooked. This article pays attention particularly to the significance of the land consolidation project that has been disregarded in folkloric studies for many years.
There is an impression that the land consolidation project after the Meiji period was developed uniformly all over the country as a national project, and after the project, the farming system changed dramatically in nature. However, it becomes clear that such impression has no foundation when looking at the background of introducing the said project in Kawashiri, Tsubatamachi located in the Lake Kahokugata northeastern area.
First, regarding the space formation, emphasis was placed on the reorganization to the Suigo space centered on the creek based on the geographical environment located in the margin of lagoon and water transportation as business since the early modern period. This increased the number of boats for farming rapidly and changed the river mouth into a berth where boathouses formed a line. In other words, the project at the time attempted the“ localization” suitable for the local history and environment.
Next, regarding the changes in work, transportation by ship became popular through the establishment of the Suigo space, and the transportation cost for rice after harvest was drastically reduced. Meanwhile, regarding the field preparation work, dry farming such as cultivation by livestock, cultivation of Chinese milk vetch, etc. was not introduced, leaving no other option but to continue the farming system of the feudal clan period.
The lack of dramatic changes in the work can be attributed not only to the soil environment where dry farming was not introduced, but also to the social and economic factors which were intricately affected: the landlords had overwhelming authority, the organization of peasants necessary for technological innovation was delayed, and the landlords did not want any changes in the fertilizer market because they were wholesalers of fertilizer. This shows that rice cultivation was a social practice that came to fruition through political and economic conformity in the local community.},
 pages = {165--221},
 title = {水郷のポリティクス : 河北潟東北岸域における耕地整理事業の導入とその史的背景（Ⅱ. “文化”としての水田）},
 volume = {162},
 year = {2011},
 yomi = {ダイモン, サトル}
}