@article{oai:rekihaku.repo.nii.ac.jp:00002011,
 author = {工藤, 雄一郎 and Kudo, Yuichiro},
 journal = {国立歴史民俗博物館研究報告, Bulletin of the National Museum of Japanese History},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {application/pdf, 2009年12月に較正曲線IntCal09が公開され，日本列島の後期旧石器時代初頭から縄文時代草創期まで，IntCalを用いて較正年代が議論できるようになった。しかしながら，すでにIntCal04で公開されていた26,000～12,000cal BPの範囲でも大きな変更が加えられており，特に土器出現期の年代域での差が著しい。IntCal09の場合，土器出現期の前後の年代域ではカリアコの海底堆積物など多くのデータが加わり，より詳細な較正曲線となったが，較正曲線が平坦な「13,000年問題」の年代域に該当するため，この年代に該当する遺跡や土器群の較正年代を絞り込むのは極めて難しいことがわかった。現状では，日本列島における土器の出現を17,000～15,000cal BPの間のどこかの可能性が高いと指摘するに留めておきたい。これに対し，IntCal09を用いてもIntCal04を用いても，隆起線文土器の年代が15,000cal BP以後が中心である点は，これまでの年代的位置づけとほとんど変わらないことがわかった。隆起線文土器に先行する土器群が，日本列島で最古段階の土器群であることは間違いないが，その中でも最古に位置づけられる土器が，列島内のどこで使用され始めたかによって，出現時の土器の用途と古環境との関係性の議論も異なってくる。土器の出現とその用途，出現の歴史的意義については単純に一般化できる問題ではなく，その後の土器の普及と古環境とのかかわりも含めて，今後詳細に議論していくことが必要である。, The latest International Calibration curve “IntCal09” was released in December 2009. It enables us to examine the absolute age of archaeological sites situated in the Japanese archipelago spanning from the Early Upper Palaeolithic to the Incipient Jomon sub period (37,000 to 11,000 cal BP) . However, it has been noticed that besides the extension of the IntCal04 before 26,000 cal BP, there have been some changes in the IntCal09 calibration curve during 26,000 to 12,000 cal BP, the time span of which has already been released in the IntCal04. In addition, these changes are more than a little different between IntCal09 and IntCal04, especially in the time span of the earliest pottery ( about 17,000–15,000 cal BP) in the Japanese archipelago. In this time span, plenty of data for the calibration from the marine sediment from the Cariaco Basin have been added to the IntCal09 dataset; however, it becomes difficult to identify the absolute age of the earliest pottery because of the shape of the calibration curve, which falls under “the year 13,000 problem”. On the contrary, the calibrated age of the Linierrelief pottery group seems to be placed after 15,000 cal BP. The calibrated age of the Linier-relief pottery estimated by the IntCal09 is not very different from that of IntCal04. There is no doubt that the pottery that precedes the Linier-relief pottery group has been placed into the earliest phase of the Incipient Jomon sub period. However, any interpretation of possible correspondence between the application of the earliest pottery and its paleoenvironmental background should vary according to the place where the earliest pottery had been used in the Japanese archipelago. The issues of the emergence of the earliest pottery, its application, and its historical significance should not have been generalized without careful consideration. Further consideration is a must for not only the emergence but also the popularization of the pottery and its relationships with the environment.},
 pages = {101--116},
 title = {日本列島における土器出現期の較正年代について : IntCal04とIntCal09の違いおよび「13,000年問題」（第Ⅰ部 縄文時代草創期における定住化）},
 volume = {172},
 year = {2012},
 yomi = {クドウ, ユウイチロウ}
}