@article{oai:rekihaku.repo.nii.ac.jp:00002105,
 author = {小島, 道裕 and Kojima, Michihiro},
 journal = {国立歴史民俗博物館研究報告, Bulletin of the National Museum of Japanese History},
 month = {Feb},
 note = {application/pdf, 洛中洛外図屏風歴博甲本は、現存最古の洛中洛外図屏風として知られているが、制作された目的や、発注者については明らかでなく、作者についても定説を見ない状況が続いていた。これに対して筆者は、描かれた事物の分析によって、室町幕府の実権を握る細川高国が、将軍足利義晴のために御所を自邸の付近に造り、家督を嫡子稙国に譲ったことを契機として、絵師狩野元信に発注した、という仮説を立てた。
しかし、発表後に、これに対する批判も出されたため、今回の共同研究での成果も踏まえて、それらについて検討を行なった。
描かれた将軍御所が何であるかは、年代や制作目的の鍵となる問題だが、筆者が想定したとおり、細川高国が造った「柳の御所」であることが、文献史料の再検討から確定し、発注者は、細川高国ないしその周辺であることが明らかとなった。
作者については、土佐派とする説は積極的な根拠がなく、狩野松栄とする説も時代的に無理があって、画風からも歴史的背景からも、美術史のこれまでの通説通り、狩野元信周辺に求めるのがやはり妥当である。
筆者の説を否定する立場の黒田日出男氏は、この間いくつかの論考を発表しているが、結果的には筆者の説とほとんど変わらないものとなっており、異なる部分については黒田氏の方が誤っていることを指摘した。筆者の解釈や記述にも誤りや不十分な点があったが、本共同研究をはじめとするこの間の研究の進展で、総体的には学界としての定説に近づいていると言える。, Rekihaku A Version is known as the oldest folding screens of Scenes In and Around Kyoto (Rakuchu-Rakugai- Zu) in existence. It is yet to be known for whom and why the work was created, and there is no established theory about its creator. Answering these questions, the author proposed a tentative theory that Hosokawa Takakuni, a powerful figure in the Muromachi Shogunate, had placed an order with painter Kano Motonobu at the occasion of building a new palace for the Shogun Ashikaga Yoshiharu near the Hosokawa residence and handing over the family headship to his heir Tanekuni.
After published, this tentative theory encountered criticism, which the present article is aimed at investigating while also taking into account the results of the latest joint research.
The shogun palace depicted in the painting is a key to clarify when and why the work was created. As had been suggested by the author, the review of historical records confirmed that the depicted site is the Yanagi Palace, which validated that Hosokawa Takakuni or someone near him had placed an order.
With regard to the creator, there is no positive evidence to support the theory that the work was painted by someone from the Tosa school of painting. Considering the period, the theory that Kano Shoei created it seems to be unlikely either. Taking into account the painting style and historical background, it is appropriate to consider that someone near Kano Motonobu painted the work, as is suggested by the theory that has been commonly accepted in the field of art history.
Dr. Hideo Kuroda, who denied the theory of the author, has presented several researches until now. However, his theory has become almost the same as my theory, and the different parts of his theory have been pointed out to be wrong. Although my study results in the past had some wrong or unclear interpretations and descriptions, the progress of this joint study and other researches has been bringing my theory to the point, in general, where it becomes an established theory in academic circles.},
 pages = {107--128},
 title = {洛中洛外図屏風歴博甲本の制作事情をめぐって（Ⅱ. 洛中洛外図屏風と社会的背景）},
 volume = {180},
 year = {2014},
 yomi = {コジマ, ミチヒロ}
}