@article{oai:rekihaku.repo.nii.ac.jp:00002413,
 author = {上野, 祥史 and Ueno, Yoshifumi},
 journal = {国立歴史民俗博物館研究報告, Bulletin of the National Museum of Japanese History},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {application/pdf, 古墳時代に副葬した鏡は，古墳時代社会の政治構造を究明する重要な資料の一つである。製作・入手時期と副葬時期を隔てた保有鏡が少なくないため，長期保有鏡の解釈は政治関係や社会体制の議論に大きな影響を与える。ことに，製作時期と副葬時期が隔たる中国鏡ではそれが顕著である。本論では，鏡の分配時期を認識するプロセスを整理し，中国鏡にも倭鏡にも適応が可能な，生産現象にも副葬現象とも整合する理解の構築を目指した。
先ず，古墳に副葬した中国鏡と倭鏡を対象に，鏡にみる4つの時間相を整理し，分配時期の抽出プロセスを比較検討した。分析において副葬時期のもつ意味・意義が大きいことを改めて確認し，鏡の分配は，製作・入手時期に対応した分配を主体としつつ，一部が長期にわたり分配を継続するという理解モデルを提示した。
その理解モデルを，倭鏡の創出における中国鏡の保有と，主題を共有する中国鏡と倭鏡の副葬推移の比較という，二つの視点を重ねて検証した。模倣の対象という視点から，中国鏡の入手時期・分配時期の定点が与えられることを示し，同じ主題を共有する中国鏡と倭鏡の相互関係を検討した。盤龍鏡を対象とした分析では，両者が相互に補完しつつ，長期にわたり副葬を継続したことを示した。
製作・入手時期と対応する短期分配を中心としつつも一部は保有を継続し分配に供したという，鏡分配の理解モデルを検証し，分配主体による保有の継続は，分配の継続を目的とするだけではなく，分配主体も器物を保有する「分有」の性格を帯びた分配故の，本質的なものであることを指摘した。鏡の長期分配を認めうることから，分配論に基づく政治秩序の変動を，継続性の視点から展望した。, Mirrors buried as grave goods in the Kofun period are one of the most important pieces of evidence that elucidates the political structure of the Kofun society.
There was often a large time gap between the production/acquisition and burial of mirrors. Depending on the interpretation, such mirrors possessed over a long period of time may have a large impact on discussions on political relationships and social structures. The influence is even more significant in the case of Chinese mirrors as the time gap between their production and burial was very large. This article aims to establish a process to determine when mirrors were distributed and develop a simulation model applicable to both Chinese and Japanese mirrors and consistent with the time of production and burial.
First, Chinese and Japanese mirrors buried in mounds are divided into four periods of time according to the mirror-based chronology. Then, the processes of determining the time of distribution are compared to one another. This analysis reconfirms the significance of dating the burial of grave goods and suggests a simulation model in which the time of distribution is determined mainly based on the time of production/acquisition but also based on the assumption that some mirrors were distributed over a long period of time.
This simulation model is examined from two points of view: (1) the analysis of relationships between the emergence of Japanese mirrors and the possession of Chinese mirrors and (2) the comparison of transitions in Chinese and Japanese mirrors of the same style buried as grave goods. The results show that we can determine the time of acquisition and distribution of Chinese mirrors by analyzing which types of Chinese mirrors were imitated. The relationships between Chinese and Japanese mirrors of the same style are compared to one another. The analysis of curved dragon mirrors indicates that Chinese and Japanese mirrors complemented each other and were used as grave goods over a long period of time.
This study examines the simulation model based on the assumption that most mirrors were distributed just after production/acquisition but some were distributed long after production/acquisition. This article also highlights that distributors kept mirrors over a long period of time, not only because they wanted to continue distributing mirrors but also essentially because distribution was transformed into shared possession (i.e. distributors kept some mirrors while distributing the rest to others). Because it is presumed that mirrors were distributed over a long period of time, this article examines the dynamics of political order based on the distribution theory from the viewpoint of continuity., 一部非公開情報あり},
 pages = {79--110},
 title = {古墳時代における鏡の分配と保有 (第1部　倭王権の実態)},
 volume = {211},
 year = {2018},
 yomi = {ウエノ, ヨシフミ}
}