@article{oai:rekihaku.repo.nii.ac.jp:00002471,
 author = {根津, 朝彦 and Nezu, Tomohiko},
 journal = {国立歴史民俗博物館研究報告, Bulletin of the National Museum of Japanese History},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {application/pdf, 本稿は，『毎日新聞』の社会部記者であった内藤国夫（1937～1999年）を中心に，東大闘争の専従記者が「1968年」報道にいかに携わったのかを明らかにする。
第1節では，運動学生の行動動機を顧みずに，かれらを「暴徒」と見なす全般的な報道の特徴を検討した。それをよく示すものが『山陽新聞』の改ざん事件と，内藤国夫が取材した王子デモ報道であった。この背景には，学生運動の「暴徒」観を根強く抱く編集幹部の存在が挙げられる。
第2節では，大学担当記者になった内藤国夫が東大専従記者となり，大河内一男総長の辞意報道に及ぼした影響や，各社が集った東大記者クラブと取材班の陣容を整理した。
第3節では，内藤の日頃の取材先を押さえた上で，東大専従記者と運動学生の緊張関係が高まった読売新聞記者「暴行」事件に焦点をあてた。この事件を契機に学生の新聞不信が激化したことと，内藤の学生のために取材をしているという「君らのため」観との間に乖離があることを示した。
第4節では，安田講堂の攻防で時計台放送が投げかけた，記者たちにとって東大闘争と報道とは一体何であったのかという，内藤を含めた記者たちの主体性を突きつける問題を考察した。それとともに警察側のデモ現場での巧妙な潜入や学生対策の実態について言及した。
内藤は，東京大学法学部の卒業生という利点をいかし，取材源に食い込み，多くのスクープをものにした。しかし，その取材現場では学生の「暴徒」観に象徴されるように，事実に向き合おうとする記者と報道機関の姿勢も問われていた。そして多様な事実を報じる回路を制約したのが，現場記者と編集幹部の認識の差であった。記事決定の裁量権をもつデスクや編集幹部の力関係の構造の下，「1968年」報道も多面的な現実を読者に報じる役割が妨げられていたのである。最後に東大闘争と学生運動における暴力の問題についても見通しを提示した。, This paper clarifies the extent of the involvement of specialist correspondents of the University of Tokyo Struggle in the "1968" report with a focus on Kunio Naito (1937-1999) who was the local news correspondent of Mainichi Shimbun.
In the first section, the authors examine the characteristics of the general reports that regarded the students of the movement as "rioters" regardless of the motivations of their actions. This representation was amply demonstrated in the falsification incident pertaining to Sanyo Shimbun, and in the Oji demonstration report written by Kunio Naito. The strongly rooted bias of executive editors forms the background of this depiction of the agitated students.
The second section of the paper is devoted to Kunio Naito, who was the reporter in charge of universities, and who became a specialist correspondent for the University of Tokyo. This section discusses Naito's influence on coverage of President Kazuo Okochi's resignation, and lists the lineup of the University of Tokyo Reporters' Club which comprises a gathering of all news organizations and of their crews.
Section 3 delves into the incident of "assault" on a Yomiuri Shimbun reporter in which tensions between the University of Tokyo specialist correspondents and the students of the movement were heightened, and led to the restriction of daily coverage by Naito. In the wake of this incident, the students' distrust of newspapers intensified, demonstrating that there was a gap between Naito's opinion that his reporting was meant for the students and the perception of the students themselves.
In section 4, the authors examine the issue of the independence of the reporters including Naito and attempt to ascertain what the University of Tokyo Struggle and its news coverage meant for the reporters. This concern is highlighted by the clock tower broadcast during the Yasuda Hall incident. Along with this event, the skillful infiltration of the police at the site of the demonstration and the realities of the student measures are also discussed.
Naito exploited the advantage of being the University of Tokyo, Department of Law graduate, and secured several scoops by making inroads into the source of the news. However, as symbolized by the perception of the students as "rioters" at the site of the incidents, the attitude of the reporters who tried to face the facts and the press organizations is also questionable. Further, the course of the reporting of various facts was constrained by the mismatch between the perception of the site reporters and the editorial executives. Based on the structure of the power relationship at news organizations, in the case of the "1968" report too, reporting of the multifaceted reality to the readers was hindered by the authority of the desk and the editorial executives. Finally, the authors' opinions with regard to the problem of violence in the University of Tokyo Struggle and during the student movements are also presented in this paper.},
 pages = {121--152},
 title = {東大闘争の専従記者から見た「1968 年」報道 : 『毎日新聞』の内藤国夫を中心に},
 volume = {216},
 year = {2019},
 yomi = {ネズ, トモヒコ}
}