@article{oai:rekihaku.repo.nii.ac.jp:00002486,
 author = {諫早, 直人 and Isahaya, Naoto},
 journal = {国立歴史民俗博物館研究報告, Bulletin of the National Museum of Japanese History},
 month = {Sep},
 note = {application/pdf, 日本列島の馬匹生産のはじまりに栄山江流域からの渡来人（渡来集団）が大きな役割を果たした，という有力な仮説がある。主として日本列島における馬関連考古資料と栄山江流域系（産）土器の遺跡レベルでの共伴関係に依拠したこの仮説の最大の問題は，肝心の栄山江流域において，いつから，そしてどのような経緯で馬匹生産がはじまり，どのように展開したのかという議論が決定的に欠如している点にある。そこで本稿では，栄山江流域を中心とする全羅南道一帯から出土している馬関連考古資料，具体的には馬具とウマ遺存体の集成をおこない，栄山江流域における馬匹生産の受容と展開について現状での整理を試みた。
まず栄山江流域出土馬具の編年をおこない，栄山江流域における馬具の出現時期は熊津期以降，すなわち5世紀後葉以降であり，百済の他地域や新羅，加耶だけでなく，倭に比しても遅れることを確認した。また馬具の系譜が多様であることを明らかにし，栄山江流域における主体的な製作や，百済中枢との一元的な関係のもとで馬具が出現したわけではないことを論じた。次にウマ遺存体の出土事例についても検討をおこない，栄山江流域における馬の本格的な飼育開始はやはり熊津期以降とみられること，栄山江流域に現れる葬送儀礼の中で馬を犠牲にする風習は百済中枢ではなく，加耶などと関連することを指摘した。漢城陥落，熊津遷都を前後する頃，栄山江流域社会に大きな変化が現れることは，既に様々な考古資料をもとに議論されてきたが，少なくとも馬匹生産の受容に関しては，百済中枢との一元的な関係では理解できず，東方の加耶の諸地域（諸集団）との関係がより大きな役割を果たした可能性を提起した。
このように栄山江流域における馬匹生産の開始時期は日本列島よりも遅れることが明らかとなった以上，日本列島に馬匹生産をもたらした渡来人（渡来集団）の故地は，栄山江流域以外の地に求めるべきであろう。, The toraijin (torai groups) were the people from overseas, especially from China and Korea, who settled in early Japan and introduced continental culture to the Japanese people. There is a predominant hypothesis that the toraijin from the Yeongsan river basin had a significant role to play at the beginning of horse breeding in the Japanese archipelago. The biggest problem with this hypothesis is that it mainly relies on the archeological references related to horses in the Japanese archipelago and the correlations at the level of ruins of the earthenware of the Yeongsan river basin lineage (produced). There is a definite lack of discussion of when and in what circumstances horse breeding began and how did it develop in the Yeongsan river basin. In this paper, we attempt to organize the current situation about the acceptance and development of horse breeding in the Yeongsan river basin. We compile archeological references related to horses excavated from the Jeollanam-do stretch with focus on the Yeongsan river basin, specifically horse trappings and horse remains.
We conducted a chronological analysis of horse trappings excavated from the Yeongsan river basin and ascertained that the period of appearance of horse trappings in the Yeongsan river basin was after the Ungjin period. The period dates back in the late 5th century, which is later compared not only to the other regions of Baekje or Silla and Gaya but also to Wa. Further, we clarify that the genealogy of the horse trappings was diverse and discuss that independent production in the Yeongsan river basin or the horse trappings did not appear under the centralized relationship with the central Baekje. We also conducted an examination of cases of appearance of horse remains, which indicates that the introduction of full-fledged breeding of horses in the Yeongsan river basin was after the Ungjin period. Additionally, the custom of sacrificing horses as part of a funeral ritual that appeared in the Yeongsan river basin was related not to the central Baekje but to Gaya, among others. Although the appearance of significant changes in the Yeongsan river basin society was during the period of the fall of Hanseong and the transfer of the capital to Ungjin as discussed based on various archeological references, the acceptance of horse breeding, at least, cannot be understood through a centralized relationship with the central Baekje. This indicates that relations with the various regions (various groups) of Gaya possibly have a more significant role to play.
Thus, we clarify that the period of the introduction of horse breeding in the Yeongsan river basin was at a later date than what has been stated in the Japanese archipelago. Consequently, one ought to look for the place where the toraijin (torai groups) who introduced horse breeding to the Japanese archipelago lived previously that is in regions other than the Yeongsan river basin.},
 pages = {153--180},
 title = {栄山江流域における馬匹生産の受容と展開 (第3部　総論)},
 volume = {217},
 year = {2019},
 yomi = {イサハヤ, ナオト}
}