@article{oai:rekihaku.repo.nii.ac.jp:00002491,
 author = {上野, 祥史 and Ueno, Yoshifumi},
 journal = {国立歴史民俗博物館研究報告, Bulletin of the National Museum of Japanese History},
 month = {Sep},
 note = {application/pdf, 器物を媒介とした政治関係は，分与者の視点で語られる傾向が強い。器物の価値を自明とする意識を相対化し，分与者および受領者が価値を認識する場やプロセスに注目した検討が求められる。朝鮮半島南部の出土鏡は，その問題をもっとも先鋭化させ鮮明にする資料である。
本論では，古墳時代と並行する三国時代において，朝鮮半島南部が保有した鏡をもとに，その入手経緯を整理し，倭王権が鏡分与を通じて企図した秩序とその構造を検討することで，倭韓の交渉の実態を描出しようと試みた。
まず，朝鮮半島南部出土鏡の概要を整理し，中国での鏡の保有状況と日本列島での鏡の保有状況を対照して，中国鏡と倭鏡の流入プロセスを検討した。中国鏡の流入は，倭韓が対中国交渉を共有し，相互に関係をもちつつも独立した交渉を進め個別に入手したものとして理解することを提案した。倭鏡では，王権からの直接分与か二次流通を介した間接分与かを，価値の認識という視点で検討した。間接分与でも王権が意図した秩序は機能すること，日本列島内部でも間接分与がみえることから，倭王権が意図した秩序は，直接分与に限定しない柔軟な，拡大の可能性を内包する秩序であることを示した。朝鮮半島南部の倭鏡は，北部九州を介した間接分与（二次流通）が想定できることを指摘した。
倭韓の交渉の実態を詳述するとともに，鏡を媒介とした秩序が，絶対基準を強く意識しすぎること，分与者と受領者の相互承認を強調しすぎることを改めて指摘し，第三者の認識を可能にする装置としての意義も考える必要があること，朝鮮半島南部の帯金式甲冑や鏡にはそうした機能が期待されたことを示した。, Political relationships mediated by objects tend to be described from the perspective of the giver. These relationships develop from the sense that the value of an object is self-evident, and the distributor and the recipient should recognize the value of the objects and the process of acquiring the objects. The mirrors unearthed in the southern region of the Korean Peninsula are a suitable material to highlight the issue.
In this paper, I analyzed the acquisition of mirrors during the Three Kingdoms period, which occurred in parallel with the Tumulus (Kofun) period, based on evidence from the mirrors owned in the southern Korean Peninsula. I tried to describe the structure that the Wa (Japan) Kingdom attempted to establish through the distribution of mirrors and the actual conditions of the negotiations between Wa and Korea.
First, I outlined the description concerning the mirrors excavated in the southern Korean Peninsula. I also examined the process of the inflows of the Chinese mirrors and the Wa mirrors by comparing ownership statistics regarding the mirrors in China and the Japanese archipelago. I suggested that the inflow of Chinese mirrors should be understood as a result of negotiations by Wa and Korea with China, which were conducted independently despite their shared relationships with China. I examined whether Wa mirrors were distributed directly by the Kingdom or indirectly through a secondary distribution from the perspective of the recognition of the values. I showed that the order the Kingdom intended to establish would function even if the mirrors were distributed indirectly, and the order the Kingdom intended to establish was one that was flexible without limiting their direct distributions and had a potential to expand since their indirect distributions are found in the Japanese archipelago. I pointed out that it is possible to assume that the Wa mirrors found in the southern Korean Peninsula were a secondary distribution that arrived via northern Kyushu.
I explained in detail the negotiations between Wa and Korea, revealing that the order enforced through mirrors would overemphasize the significance of the mutual agreement between the distributors and the recipients. Additionally, I showed that it is necessary to consider the significance of a device that would enable a third party to have the recognition, and that such a function was expected for metal-strap armors and mirrors in the southern Korean Peninsula.},
 pages = {291--317},
 title = {朝鮮半島南部の鏡と倭韓の交渉 (第5部　総論)},
 volume = {217},
 year = {2019},
 yomi = {ウエノ, ヨシフミ}
}