{"created":"2023-05-15T14:47:31.946431+00:00","id":2763,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"df1e6d2c-7282-477b-ba04-3e574974aca8"},"_deposit":{"created_by":3,"id":"2763","owners":[3],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"2763"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:rekihaku.repo.nii.ac.jp:00002763","sets":["21:252"]},"author_link":["6974","6975"],"control_number":"2763","item_10002_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2021-03-15","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"49","bibliographicPageStart":"31","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"223","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"国立歴史民俗博物館研究報告","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"},{"bibliographic_title":"Bulletin of the National Museum of Japanese History","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_10002_description_19":{"attribute_name":"フォーマット","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"application/pdf","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_10002_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"中国の海上交通は淮河を挟んで南北に分かれ、北方の海運は「北号」、南方の海運は「南号」と呼ばれていた。北号に対応する交通ルートはその行程から大きく(一)杭州から直沽(現在の天津)に至る海上ルート、(二)杭州から大運河を経由して直沽の北運河(大運河)から通州に至るルート、(三)通州から大都に至る運河である通恵河の三つのルートに区分できる。また、南号に対応する輸送ルートとしては、(一)泉州から福州へ至り、さらに杭州へ至る海上ルート、(二)泉州から福州へ至った後、閩江沿いに内陸部へ入り、鉛山を経由して杭州へ至る陸上ルートのふたつがある。\n一方、海外交通路としては、西洋航路・東洋航路・浙江(慶元)から日本(博多)に至るルート、福建から琉球・九州へ至るルートがあった。西洋航路は泉州・広州から出航して、占城を経由し、木剌由(ムラユ／スマトラ)、さらにはインド洋まで達する海上ルートであり、元代では最大の幹線であった。中継地としては、大越に代わってチャンパが、三仏齊(ザーバジ／マライ・スマトラ地域)に代わってジャワが擡頭してきた。東洋航路は泉州を出航して台湾島の東部からフィリピンへ南下し、ボルネオ島経由でマラッカ海峡に向かい、インド洋に抜けるルートである。この時期から琉球(現在の台湾～沖縄)・三嶼(現在のフィリピン)が中継拠点となり始め、明代になると日本ともリンクしてさらに東洋航路の重要性が増加したと言われる。さらに、元朝末期頃から南九州～沖縄経由の中国渡航ルートが利用されたと言われているが、それ以前の主要交通路は博多と慶元(寧波／明州)を繋ぐ海上ルートであった。日本史側の史料では「大洋路」と呼ばれている。このルートは宋代から日本と中国を結ぶ主要幹線であった。\n元朝の政治状況とこれらの海上交通ルートの関係としては、宋の旧制を引き継いだ元朝が、宰相アフマドから宰相サンガに至る中央集権の重商主義採用期に国家による海上運送の管理体制を強めた。具体的には、江浙行省・行泉府司を海事政策の中軸として海運・市舶、さらには塩課もその属下に組み込んで包括的な行政機構を構築しようとしたものであった。言葉を換えれば、国内輸送路と海外交通路をより一体的に結びつけ、税糧の歳輸のみならず、南海貿易の利益も江南から京師へダイレクトにもたらされる体制を築き上げようとしたのである。しかし、既存勢力や地域社会からの反発も強く、結局は宰相サンガの失脚後に南海貿易路と南号の海上交通路を結びつけた海站は廃止され、それぞれの地域社会の豪民(＝新興ローカルエリート)に海上運送を依存する体制に引き戻された。","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"},{"subitem_description":"The maritime transport of Song-Yuan China was divided into northern and southern lines with the Huai River as the boundary. Shipping agents of the two lines were called beihao and nanhao, respectively. The beihao mainly used the following three routes: (1) the sea route from Hangzhou to Zhigu (presentday Tianjin); (2) the route running along the Grand Canal from Hangzhou to Zhigu and then travelling along the North Canal (Grand Canal) to Tongzhou; and (3) the route along the Tonghui Canal from Tongzhou to Daidu. The nanhao travelled either of the following two paths: (1) the sea route from Quanzhou through Fuzhou to Hangzhou and (2) the inland water route running along the same path from Quanzhou to Fuzhou and then following the Min River towards upstream and going through Qianshan to Hangzhou.\nMeanwhile, maritime trade was routed through the Xiyang route (western route across the South China Sea), the Dongyang route (eastern route across the South China Sea), the Qingyuan (Ningbo/Mingzhou)-Hakata route (connecting Zhejiang to Japan), and the Fujian-Ryukyu/Kyushu route. The Xiyang route was the most important route in the Yuan period from Quanzhou/Guangzhou via Champa and Melayu (in Sumatra) to the Indian Ocean. On this route, Champa and Java rose to prominence as transit points, replacing Dayue (Vietnam) and Zabaj/Javaka/Sanfogi (in the Sumatra region), respectively. The Dongyang route started from Quanzhou, went south along the east coast of Taiwan Island to the Philippines, and ran through Borneo Island and the Malacca Strait to the Indian Ocean. It is said that around that time, Ryukyu (present-day Taiwan and Okinawa) and Sanyu (the present-day Philippines) emerged as transit points and then, in the Ming period, the Dongyang route itself gained greater importance as it was linked to Japan. The route connecting Hakata and Qingyuan called “Ocean Route” in Japanese historical records was served as the mainline of trade between Japan and China in the Song and Yuan periods.\nThe Yuan Dynasty strengthened its control over maritime traffic under the centralized mercantilism during Minster Ahmad and Minister Sanga. More specifically, they intended to reestablish a maritime administration comprehensively centred on the financial branch of the Jiangzhe provincial government with the maritime trade bureau and the salt tax bureau under its umbrella. In other words, they tried to build a system to directly bring the revenues not only from the tax but also from the Nanhai trade connecting the inland and maritime transportation from coastal area to the capital city. However, this policy provoked a strong backlash from local powers of Zhejiang and Fujian and returned to a previous way, where marine transport relied on powerful local families (emerging local elites), as the maritime stations established to connect the South China Sea trade routes to the transport lines of nanhao were abandoned after Minster Sanga was executed.","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10002_heading_23":{"attribute_name":"見出し","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_heading_banner_headline":"[共同研究] 中世日本の国際交流における海上交通に関する研究","subitem_heading_language":"ja"},{"subitem_heading_banner_headline":"[Collaborative Research] A Study of the Role of Marine Transportation in International Exchanges in Medieval Japan","subitem_heading_language":"en"}]},"item_10002_publisher_8":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"国立歴史民俗博物館","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"}]},"item_10002_relation_17":{"attribute_name":"関連サイト","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_relation_name":[{"subitem_relation_name_text":"第223集 収録論文 タイトルリスト"}],"subitem_relation_type_id":{"subitem_relation_type_id_text":"https://www.rekihaku.ac.jp/outline/publication/ronbun/ronbun9/index.html#no223","subitem_relation_type_select":"URI"}}]},"item_10002_source_id_11":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN00377607","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_10002_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"0286-7400","subitem_source_identifier_type":"PISSN"}]},"item_10002_version_type_20":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"四日市, 康博","creatorNameLang":"ja"},{"creatorName":"ヨッカイチ, ヤスヒロ","creatorNameLang":"ja-Kana"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"Yokkaichi, Yasuhiro","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2022-04-01"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"kenkyuhokoku_223_04.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"3.5 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"kenkyuhokoku_223_04.pdf","url":"https://rekihaku.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2763/files/kenkyuhokoku_223_04.pdf"},"version_id":"fcbe20ae-06b6-4994-b81c-247ed90d3733"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"北号","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"南号","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"杭州","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"大都","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"慶元(寧波)","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"泉州","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"西洋航路","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"東洋航路","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"南海貿易","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"斡脱","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Beihao","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Nanhao(Northern and Southern coastal routes of China)","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Hangzhou","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Daidu(Beijing)","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Qingyuan(Ningbo)","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Quanzhou","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Xiyang","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Dongyang(Western and Eastern routes across the South China Sea and Indian Ocean)","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Nanhai trade(trade of South China Sea and Indian Ocean)","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"ortuγ","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"[論文] 元代の海上交通","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"[論文] 元代の海上交通","subitem_title_language":"ja"},{"subitem_title":"[Article] Maritime Transport of the Yuan Period","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"10002","owner":"3","path":["252"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2022-04-01"},"publish_date":"2022-04-01","publish_status":"0","recid":"2763","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["[論文] 元代の海上交通"],"weko_creator_id":"3","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-08-14T07:27:01.007284+00:00"}