@article{oai:rekihaku.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000281,
 author = {李,  昌煕 and Lee,  Chang-Hee},
 journal = {国立歴史民俗博物館研究報告, Bulletin of the National Museum of Japanese History},
 month = {Feb},
 note = {application/pdf, 日韓両地域における鉄器の出現は，燕国の鉄器生産能力の増大，それによる東方への普及に伴ったものと考えられてきた。その時期は戦国末から前漢初にあたると考えられているために，出現年代は紀元前3世紀をさかのぼることはない。しかしその根拠は明確ではなく，燕国における鉄器の普及は紀元前300年よりも古かった可能性が説かれつつある。
このような状況の下，韓半島最古の鉄器に伴う円形粘土帯土器の実年代を，炭素14年代を用いて明らかにした結果，韓半島ではすでに紀元前4世紀には鉄器が出現していたことがわかった。この結果は，鉄器が出土した遺構の炭素14年代，弥生長期編年，そして粘土帯土器と弥生土器との併行関係とも整合的である。
さらに鉄斧を中心に韓半島の初期鉄器を検討し，日本の資料との比較も行ったところ，両地域での鉄器の出現時期には大きな差はないが，その特徴は異なることもわかった。すなわち鋳造鉄斧には形態，鋳型，出土状況など多くの差異が見られるのである。しかし，これは二条突帯斧の出土事例が韓半島より日本列島の方が多いことに原因の一つがあると考えられる。したがって，日本列島を燕国の影響圏に含めることで，韓半島を介した流入ではなく燕からの直接流入と考えるのは妥当ではないと考える。
日韓両地域で出土する外来系土器をふまえて考えると，日本列島最古の鉄器の出現は円形粘土帯土器人の移住と係っている。円形粘土帯土器は日韓地域ともに在地系ではなく外来系の土器である。円形粘土帯土器人がもっていた初期鉄器とその技術および使い方が，移住地への定着過程で，在地の環境の違いによって変わっていったと考えられる。当時の松菊里文化と弥生文化における取り込まれ方の違いによって両文化の鉄器に対するあり方も異なってくるだろう。, Iron implements have been considered to have appeared in the Japanese and Korean regions along with the Yan State’s enhanced production capacity of iron implements and their proliferation to the eastern area. That time has been estimated from the end of the Warring States Period to the beginning of the Former Han Dynasty. Therefore, the appearance of iron implements has not been dated back to before the third century B.C. However, there are no tangible grounds for the dating. Some researchers are suggesting the possibility that iron implements spread out in the Yan State before 300 B.C.
Under these circumstances, the calendar date of round clay-stripe pottery, closely related with the oldest iron implements in the Korean Peninsula, was estimated by using the carbon-14 dating method. The estimation indicates that iron implements already appeared in the Korean Peninsula in the fourth century B.C. This result is consistent with the carbon-14 date of the ancient foundations from which iron implements were unearthed as well as an assumption of the long chronology of the Yayoi culture and simultaneous existence of clay-stripe pottery and Yayoi pottery.
A further study on early iron implements in the Korean Peninsula was conducted while laying stress on iron axes and making a comparison with Japanese materials. The study reveals the differences in features of iron implements between the two regions in spite of the almost simultaneous appearance. Cast iron axes seem to have had wide variations in the shape, mold, and excavation condition. One of the reasons for this is considered, however, that more double-banded axes have been excavated in the Japanese Islands than in the Korean Peninsula. Therefore, this article does not consider it appropriate to understand that the Japanese islands were under the influence of the Yan State or that iron implements were introduced into the Japanese Islands directly from the Yan State but not through the Korean Peninsula.
Judged from the foreign pottery unearthed in the Japanese and Korean regions, the appearance of the oldest iron implements in the Japanese Islands seem to have had a close connection with the immigration of people with round clay-stripe pottery. Round clay-stripe pottery in both regions were not locally originated but derived from overseas. Early iron implements and related technologies of the immigrants seem to have been transformed according to the local environment in the course of their settlement. A study on the differences of how to accept iron implements between the Songgukri culture and the Yayoi culture can reveal differences of attitudes and perspectives concerning iron implements between the two cultures.},
 pages = {93--110},
 title = {韓半島における初期鉄器の年代と特質},
 volume = {185},
 year = {2014}
}