@article{oai:rekihaku.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000899,
 author = {小倉, 慈司 and Ogura, Shigeji},
 journal = {国立歴史民俗博物館研究報告, Bulletin of the National Museum of Japanese History},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {application/pdf, 本稿は，日本古代の史料に押捺された印影を主に収録した摸古印譜（日本古印譜）について，その系譜を明らかにすることを目的とした調査の中間報告である。今回は特に日本古印の研究の基礎を築きその後の日本古印譜作成に大きな影響を与えた藤貞幹が登場する以前の時期に焦点をあてて調査を行なった。
近世にいたり古印への関心が高まった背景には，古文書への関心の高まり，篆刻界における復古体の流行，さらには朝廷内における朝儀復興の動きといったことが考えられよう。現在確認される最古の日本古印譜は，松崎祐之作成の『印譜』であるが，この存在はあまり知られることはなかったらしく，以後の日本古印譜にも影響を与えた形跡を見出せない。次に挙げられるのが，藤原惺窩が輯し成慶が増補したと伝えられる印譜であるが，現在，管見の限りではあるものの，成慶が作成した印譜の転写本以外にはこの印譜を発見することはできなかった。伝惺窩作成印譜と成慶作成印譜とは元来別のものであったと考えられるが，成慶作成印譜が転写を重ねるうちに伝惺窩作成印譜と混同されるようになったのではなかろうか。ちなみに伝惺窩作成印譜は実際には惺窩作ではなく，後に仮託されたものと想像される。篆刻家高芙蓉が作成したとされる古印譜もかつて存在したらしいが，今に伝わらず，後世の印譜に引用された印影によって，その内容をうかがうことができるのみである。それによれば，芙蓉作成印譜の中には明らかに偽印と見做される印影も含まれていた。藤貞幹が日本古印譜を作成する以前には以上のような印譜が存在しており，それらが貞幹の印譜研究に与えた影響は大きいと考えられる。, This paper is an interim report of my survey conducted to clarify the genealogy of Nippon Koinpu or a seal mark book which records seal marks impressed on historical materials of old ages of Japan as main contents. I conducted this survey recently, especially focusing on the era prior to the time when TŌ, Teikan appeared, who provided a basis for studies on old seals of Japan and gave much influence on the subsequent preparation of books on Japanese seal marks of old times.
The background for the people's increasing interest in old seals in the early modern ages is considered to be based on the trend where the interest in old documents increased, old styles became popular in the seal engraving field, and ancient ceremonies were revived in the Imperial Court. The oldest Koinpu of Japan, so far as I confirmed, is the one prepared by MATSUZAKI, Sukeyuki. However, its presence was not well known to the public at that time, and I could not find any influence of his book on the later Koinpu of Japan. The Koinpu produced next was the one that Later Koinpu producers regarded it was edited by FUJIWARA, Seika, and enlarged by Jōkei. Based on my limited knowledge, only a transcribed copy of the book prepared by Jōkei was found, leaving all others unlocated. I consider that the Koinpu prepared by Seika and the one prepared by Jōkei are really different from each other. However, I suppose that Jōkei's Koinpu was confused with Seika's Koinpu while the former was being transcribed repeatedly. I assume that Seika's Koinpu was not prepared by him actually, but it was regarded as his work afterwards. An old Koinpu reportedly prepared by a seal engraver, KŌ, Fuyō, might exist in the past, but it is lost presently.
Only the seal marks quoted in Koinpu of later ages allows the contents to be understood. According to them, the Koinpu produced by Fuyō contained some seal marks that are clearly judged as false marks. These Koinpu existed before TŌ, Teikan produced Koinpu, and I consider that such books have given a great influence on Teikan's study on seal marks.},
 pages = {581--593},
 title = {日本古印譜の研究(序説) : 藤貞幹以前について（Ⅳ. 論考 / 3. 古代印関連論 : 制度・印譜・復原・科学的調査）},
 volume = {79},
 year = {1999},
 yomi = {オグラ, シゲジ}
}