{"created":"2023-05-15T14:46:03.354908+00:00","id":968,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"39e9b4f7-8b4a-48e5-8042-2536f7678aef"},"_deposit":{"created_by":3,"id":"968","owners":[3],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"968"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:rekihaku.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000968","sets":["21:115"]},"author_link":["2643","2644"],"control_number":"968","item_10002_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2001-03-30","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"74","bibliographicPageStart":"53","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"87","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"国立歴史民俗博物館研究報告","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"},{"bibliographic_title":"Bulletin of the National Museum of Japanese History","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_10002_description_19":{"attribute_name":"フォーマット","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"application/pdf","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_10002_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"柳田国男は，民俗学における生業・労働研究を狭隘にし，その魅力を減少させた。それは，民俗学の成立事情と大きく関わっている。その後，民俗学を継承した研究者にも同様の研究のあり方が，少なからず継承される。しかし，1980年代末から90年代にかけて，新しい視点と方法をもって，旧来の狭い生業・労働研究の超克が模索された。この模索は，「生態民俗学」，「民俗自然誌」，「環境民俗学」という三つの大きな潮流に区分できる。\n「生態民俗学」は，野本寛一により提唱された。それは，便宜的な項目やテーマが実態視されるようになって，研究分野として拡散してしまった従来の民俗誌（民俗報告書）の枠組みを壊すものとして評価される。それは，自然を軸として，民俗事象相互の関係や，その連続性のダイナミズムに関心を払いながら再統合することにより，本来の民俗誌をあるべき姿へと回復させる。\n「民俗自然誌」は，篠原徹により提唱された。それは，従来の民俗学が前提として認めてきた伝承母体（集団）から，個人へ視点を転換させるものとして評価される。それは，従来の民俗学が頻繁に採用してきた，文化の深層や基層，あるいはエトノスへと安易に繋げる歴史還元主義に利用されてきた伝承を，現在理解の素材としての伝承へと実質的に回帰させる。\n「環境民俗学」は，鳥越皓之により提唱された。それは，民俗学自体に拘泥されない脱領域的な研究手法から，生活者の立場に立って実践を行う点において評価される。それは，民俗学が初発に保持していたはずの経世済民の思想に，民俗学を回帰させる役割を果たす。\nこれら三つの研究の潮流は，生業や労働の理論や方法に関して，1990年以前のものよりも，圧倒的に質的な妥当性を保持している。","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"},{"subitem_description":"YANAGITA Kunio narrowed the study of subsistence and made it less attractive in the field of folklore. This was greatly related with the establishing situation of folklore. The same attitude of the study was more or less succeeded by the following folklorists. However, from the end of the 1980's to the 1990's, it has been tried to overcome the narrowness or the traditional study of subsistence with new viewpoints and methods. These attempts are divided into three major categories; ecological folklore, natural history of folklore and environmental folklore.\n“Ecological folklore” is advocated by NOMOTO Kan'ichi. This theory is appreciated because it breaks the former framework of ethnography (reports of folklore), whose topics and themes for convenience sake have been substantialized without reality and spread away as individual fields of study. It reconstructs a framework, nature as the pivot, taking interest in mutual relations between each phenomenon of folklore and its dynamism of continuity, thus it restores ethnography to the state they originally should be.\n“Natural history of folklore” is proposed by SHINOHARA Toru. It is appreciated in respect of the conversion of viewpoint; from the parent body of transmission (group), which has been approved as a premise to the individual. The transmission has been easily connected to the deep or inner layer of culture, or to the ethnos in the studies of folklore up to now, and it has been used as a tool for the restoral historicism. This attempt substantially brings back the transmission to the materials of understanding the present day.\n“Environmental folklore” is put forward by TORIGOE Hiroyuki. It is valued that he puts it into practice from the standpoint of ordinary living people, by studying methods beyond the sphere of the folklore and free from it. It plays a role to bring folklore back to the original state which must have had the initial idea of national administration and relief.\nThe current of these three approaches concerning the theory and methods has far more propriety in quality than the one before the turn of the decade to the 1990's.","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10002_heading_23":{"attribute_name":"見出し","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_heading_banner_headline":"[共同研究] 日本歴史における労働と自然","subitem_heading_language":"ja"},{"subitem_heading_banner_headline":"[Collaborative Research] Labor and Nature in Japanese History","subitem_heading_language":"en"}]},"item_10002_identifier_registration":{"attribute_name":"ID登録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_reg_text":"10.15024/00000951","subitem_identifier_reg_type":"JaLC"}]},"item_10002_publisher_8":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"国立歴史民俗博物館","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"}]},"item_10002_relation_17":{"attribute_name":"関連サイト","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_relation_name":[{"subitem_relation_name_text":"第87集 収録論文 タイトルリスト"}],"subitem_relation_type_id":{"subitem_relation_type_id_text":"https://www.rekihaku.ac.jp/outline/publication/ronbun/ronbun4/index.html#no87","subitem_relation_type_select":"URI"}}]},"item_10002_source_id_11":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN00377607","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_10002_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"0286-7400","subitem_source_identifier_type":"PISSN"}]},"item_10002_version_type_20":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"菅, 豊","creatorNameLang":"ja"},{"creatorName":"スガ, ユタカ","creatorNameLang":"ja-Kana"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"Suga, Yutaka","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2016-04-01"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"kenkyuhokoku_087_05.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"2.0 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"kenkyuhokoku_087_05.pdf","url":"https://rekihaku.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/968/files/kenkyuhokoku_087_05.pdf"},"version_id":"466a6ee3-d742-4180-9dc9-c7b66875c1a9"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"自然をめぐる労働論からの民俗学批評（方法と理論）","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"自然をめぐる労働論からの民俗学批評（方法と理論）","subitem_title_language":"ja"},{"subitem_title":"A Review of Folklore from the Standpoint of “Labor in Nature”（Method and Theory）","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"10002","owner":"3","path":["115"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2016-04-01"},"publish_date":"2016-04-01","publish_status":"0","recid":"968","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["自然をめぐる労働論からの民俗学批評（方法と理論）"],"weko_creator_id":"3","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-08-29T00:17:22.660300+00:00"}