WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "b80a90b0-b952-4837-9375-4de8bdd8aee2"}, "_deposit": {"created_by": 3, "id": "1734", "owners": [3], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "1734"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:rekihaku.repo.nii.ac.jp:00001734", "sets": ["179"]}, "author_link": ["4211", "4212"], "control_number": "1734", "item_10002_biblio_info_7": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2009-03-31", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "400", "bibliographicPageStart": "373", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "152", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "国立歴史民俗博物館研究報告", "bibliographic_titleLang": "ja"}, {"bibliographic_title": "Bulletin of the National Museum of Japanese History", "bibliographic_titleLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_10002_description_19": {"attribute_name": "フォーマット", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "application/pdf", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_10002_description_5": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "本稿は,水田稲作が大阪平野でどのように始まったのか,そのプロセスやメカニズムを,ヨーロッパ先史考古学のフロンティア理論を用いて考えたものである。30年ほど前からこの地域における水田稲作の開始問題を論ずる場合には二つの大きな考え方があった。一つは本地域の西方から水田稲作民がやってきて入植し,もともと住んでいた在来の採集狩猟民である近畿縄文人と共存して,その中で交流が始まって水田稲作が広まったという「移住説・外来説」「住み分け説」と,近畿縄文人が水田稲作の技術を受け入れて,農耕民に転換していったという「自生説」である。この二つの解釈の根拠は,地元の人びとが使うと仮定された縄文系土器と,西方からやって来た人びとが使うと仮定された遠賀川系土器との関係にある。すなわち両者が同時に存在していたのか,それとも時期差なのかという点である。大阪平野では二つの土器群が確実に共伴する遺構がほとんど知られていないので,これまで同時存在なのか時期差なのか決め手に欠ける状況が続いていた。\n本稿では,二つの土器群に付着する炭化物の炭素14年代値をもとに算出した土器群の較正暦年代を使って比較したところ,二つの土器群の一部が同時に存在していたことがわかった。その期間は100~150年にも達する。しかもこの期間の水田は定型化した灌漑施設をもつものではなく,土器自体も弥生土器として定型化する前の段階にあたることから,縄文社会が水田稲作を始めてから弥生社会へと転換するための準備期間に相当し,定型化するまで100~150年を要したことを意味している。\nこのように縄文文化的な特徴が色濃く残る大阪平野の弥生Ⅰ期前葉は,少数のニューカマーと多数のネイティブとの接触交流によって,ニューカマーのもつ文化に100年以上かかって地域全体が統合されていくというフロンティア理論に近いことがわかった。水田稲作が始まるやいなやきわめて短期間のうちにコメの生産量を増大し,社会が急速に発展したという従来の説明とはほど遠い状況だったことを明らかにした。", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}, {"subitem_description": "This paper considers the process and mechanism by which wet rice cultivation began in the Osaka Plain, using the Frontier Theory from European prehistoric archaeology. For about the past 30 years or so there have been two broad approaches when discussing the question of the beginning of wet rice cultivation in this region. According to one, rice farmers from further west of the region came and settled, and interaction began while coexisting with the Kinki Jomon man hunters and gatherers who had already lived there for some time, resulting in the spread of wet rice cultivation. These are the“migration and outsider”and“segregation”theories. Then there is the“indigenous”theory, according to which Kinki Jomon people obtained wet rice cultivation technology and became farmers. The basis for these two interpretations is the relationship between Jomon implements presumed to have been used by native inhabitants and the Onga River implements presumed to have been used by people from the west. That is to say, these interpretations are based on whether both existed simultaneously or whether there was a time interval. Since there are virtually no known archaeological sites in the Osaka Plain where these two groups of implements have definitely been found together, so far a decisive factor with the potential to determine either simultaneous coexistence or a time interval has been lacking.\nIn the study described here, a comparison using the calibrated calendar years for the groups of implements calculated based on C14 values of carbonized materials adhering to the two types of implements revealed that some items in both groups existed at the same time. This period extends for as long as 100 to 150 years. What is more, rice paddies at this time did not have standardized irrigation systems and the implements themselves belong to the stage prior to the standardization of Yayoi implements. Consequently, this represents a preparation period for Jomon society to make the switch to Yayoi society after they had started cultivating rice, which means that standardization required a period of 100 to 150 years.\nAs a result of interaction between a small number of newcomers and a large number of natives in the Osaka Plain in the beginning of the Yayoi period when characteristics of Jomon culture were still much in evidence, the culture of the newcomers took more than 100 years to become integrated across the entire region. This is similar to Frontier Theory. In conclusion, the study shows that the situation was a far cry from the conventional explanation that society developed rapidly due to the increase in the volume rice production in an extremely short time after it began.", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_10002_heading_23": {"attribute_name": "見出し", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_heading_banner_headline": "[共同研究] 古代における生産と権力とイデオロギー", "subitem_heading_language": "ja"}, {"subitem_heading_banner_headline": "[Collaborative Research] Production, Authority, and Ideology in Ancient Japan", "subitem_heading_language": "en"}]}, "item_10002_identifier_registration": {"attribute_name": "ID登録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_reg_text": "10.15024/00001717", "subitem_identifier_reg_type": "JaLC"}]}, "item_10002_publisher_8": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "国立歴史民俗博物館", "subitem_publisher_language": "ja"}]}, "item_10002_relation_17": {"attribute_name": "関連サイト", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_relation_name": [{"subitem_relation_name_text": "第152集 収録論文 タイトルリスト"}], "subitem_relation_type_id": {"subitem_relation_type_id_text": "https://www.rekihaku.ac.jp/outline/publication/ronbun/ronbun7/index.html#no152", "subitem_relation_type_select": "URI"}}]}, "item_10002_source_id_11": {"attribute_name": "書誌レコードID", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "AN00377607", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "NCID"}]}, "item_10002_source_id_9": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "0286-7400", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "PISSN"}]}, "item_10002_version_type_20": {"attribute_name": "著者版フラグ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_version_resource": "http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85", "subitem_version_type": "VoR"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "藤尾, 慎一郎", "creatorNameLang": "ja"}, {"creatorName": "フジオ, シンイチロウ", "creatorNameLang": "ja-Kana"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "4211", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Fujio, Shinichiro", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "4212", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2016-04-01"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "kenkyuhokoku_152_14.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "1.6 MB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 1600000.0, "url": {"label": "kenkyuhokoku_152_14.pdf", "url": "https://rekihaku.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/1734/files/kenkyuhokoku_152_14.pdf"}, "version_id": "8e044d69-6c41-40a7-ad86-6a0661535f9c"}]}, "item_keyword": {"attribute_name": "キーワード", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_subject": "相互交流モデル", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "在来人", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "長原式土器", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "遠賀川系土器", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "古河内潟", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "近畿", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "弥生", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "Interaction model", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "native", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "Nagara type pottery", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "Ongagawa type pottery", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "Old Kawachi Lake", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "Kinki", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "Yayoi", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "弥生開始期の集団関係 : 古河内潟沿岸の場合(第3部 古代接触領域の研究)", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "弥生開始期の集団関係 : 古河内潟沿岸の場合(第3部 古代接触領域の研究)", "subitem_title_language": "ja"}, {"subitem_title": "Interaction between the Jomon Farmer and the Yayoi Farmer in the Beginning of the Yayoi Period along the Old Kawachi Lake(Part 3 Research on Contiguous Territories in the Ancient Period)", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "10002", "owner": "3", "path": ["179"], "permalink_uri": "https://doi.org/10.15024/00001717", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "PubDate", "attribute_value": "2016-04-01"}, "publish_date": "2016-04-01", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "1734", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["弥生開始期の集団関係 : 古河内潟沿岸の場合(第3部 古代接触領域の研究)"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
弥生開始期の集団関係 : 古河内潟沿岸の場合(第3部 古代接触領域の研究)
https://doi.org/10.15024/00001717
https://doi.org/10.15024/0000171797c8efdf-4ad5-48ba-87c4-ec463cf64cba
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
kenkyuhokoku_152_14.pdf (1.6 MB)
|
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2016-04-01 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
言語 | ja | |||||
タイトル | 弥生開始期の集団関係 : 古河内潟沿岸の場合(第3部 古代接触領域の研究) | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
タイトル | Interaction between the Jomon Farmer and the Yayoi Farmer in the Beginning of the Yayoi Period along the Old Kawachi Lake(Part 3 Research on Contiguous Territories in the Ancient Period) | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 相互交流モデル | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 在来人 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 長原式土器 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 遠賀川系土器 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 古河内潟 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 近畿 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 弥生 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Interaction model | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | native | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Nagara type pottery | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Ongagawa type pottery | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Old Kawachi Lake | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Kinki | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Yayoi | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
ID登録 | ||||||
ID登録 | 10.15024/00001717 | |||||
ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
著者 |
藤尾, 慎一郎
× 藤尾, 慎一郎× Fujio, Shinichiro |
|||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | 本稿は,水田稲作が大阪平野でどのように始まったのか,そのプロセスやメカニズムを,ヨーロッパ先史考古学のフロンティア理論を用いて考えたものである。30年ほど前からこの地域における水田稲作の開始問題を論ずる場合には二つの大きな考え方があった。一つは本地域の西方から水田稲作民がやってきて入植し,もともと住んでいた在来の採集狩猟民である近畿縄文人と共存して,その中で交流が始まって水田稲作が広まったという「移住説・外来説」「住み分け説」と,近畿縄文人が水田稲作の技術を受け入れて,農耕民に転換していったという「自生説」である。この二つの解釈の根拠は,地元の人びとが使うと仮定された縄文系土器と,西方からやって来た人びとが使うと仮定された遠賀川系土器との関係にある。すなわち両者が同時に存在していたのか,それとも時期差なのかという点である。大阪平野では二つの土器群が確実に共伴する遺構がほとんど知られていないので,これまで同時存在なのか時期差なのか決め手に欠ける状況が続いていた。 本稿では,二つの土器群に付着する炭化物の炭素14年代値をもとに算出した土器群の較正暦年代を使って比較したところ,二つの土器群の一部が同時に存在していたことがわかった。その期間は100~150年にも達する。しかもこの期間の水田は定型化した灌漑施設をもつものではなく,土器自体も弥生土器として定型化する前の段階にあたることから,縄文社会が水田稲作を始めてから弥生社会へと転換するための準備期間に相当し,定型化するまで100~150年を要したことを意味している。 このように縄文文化的な特徴が色濃く残る大阪平野の弥生Ⅰ期前葉は,少数のニューカマーと多数のネイティブとの接触交流によって,ニューカマーのもつ文化に100年以上かかって地域全体が統合されていくというフロンティア理論に近いことがわかった。水田稲作が始まるやいなやきわめて短期間のうちにコメの生産量を増大し,社会が急速に発展したという従来の説明とはほど遠い状況だったことを明らかにした。 |
|||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | This paper considers the process and mechanism by which wet rice cultivation began in the Osaka Plain, using the Frontier Theory from European prehistoric archaeology. For about the past 30 years or so there have been two broad approaches when discussing the question of the beginning of wet rice cultivation in this region. According to one, rice farmers from further west of the region came and settled, and interaction began while coexisting with the Kinki Jomon man hunters and gatherers who had already lived there for some time, resulting in the spread of wet rice cultivation. These are the“migration and outsider”and“segregation”theories. Then there is the“indigenous”theory, according to which Kinki Jomon people obtained wet rice cultivation technology and became farmers. The basis for these two interpretations is the relationship between Jomon implements presumed to have been used by native inhabitants and the Onga River implements presumed to have been used by people from the west. That is to say, these interpretations are based on whether both existed simultaneously or whether there was a time interval. Since there are virtually no known archaeological sites in the Osaka Plain where these two groups of implements have definitely been found together, so far a decisive factor with the potential to determine either simultaneous coexistence or a time interval has been lacking. In the study described here, a comparison using the calibrated calendar years for the groups of implements calculated based on C14 values of carbonized materials adhering to the two types of implements revealed that some items in both groups existed at the same time. This period extends for as long as 100 to 150 years. What is more, rice paddies at this time did not have standardized irrigation systems and the implements themselves belong to the stage prior to the standardization of Yayoi implements. Consequently, this represents a preparation period for Jomon society to make the switch to Yayoi society after they had started cultivating rice, which means that standardization required a period of 100 to 150 years. As a result of interaction between a small number of newcomers and a large number of natives in the Osaka Plain in the beginning of the Yayoi period when characteristics of Jomon culture were still much in evidence, the culture of the newcomers took more than 100 years to become integrated across the entire region. This is similar to Frontier Theory. In conclusion, the study shows that the situation was a far cry from the conventional explanation that society developed rapidly due to the increase in the volume rice production in an extremely short time after it began. |
|||||
書誌情報 |
ja : 国立歴史民俗博物館研究報告 en : Bulletin of the National Museum of Japanese History 巻 152, p. 373-400, 発行日 2009-03-31 |
|||||
出版者 | ||||||
言語 | ja | |||||
出版者 | 国立歴史民俗博物館 | |||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 0286-7400 | |||||
書誌レコードID | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
収録物識別子 | AN00377607 | |||||
関連サイト | ||||||
識別子タイプ | URI | |||||
関連識別子 | https://www.rekihaku.ac.jp/outline/publication/ronbun/ronbun7/index.html#no152 | |||||
関連名称 | 第152集 収録論文 タイトルリスト | |||||
フォーマット | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||
著者版フラグ | ||||||
出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
見出し | ||||||
大見出し | [共同研究] 古代における生産と権力とイデオロギー | |||||
言語 | ja | |||||
見出し | ||||||
大見出し | [Collaborative Research] Production, Authority, and Ideology in Ancient Japan | |||||
言語 | en |